A new aliveness rhythm analysis reputation has highlighted the environmental credential of cartonboard packaging when compare against fossil - ground alternatives .

Published in June 2021 , ' Cartonboard Life Cycle ; Comparing the carbon footprint of carton promotional material against alternative solution ' , goes into the granular detail of the provenience - to - grave environmental performance of cartonboard in frozen food , quick meal , fast solid food and small electricals publicity , compare to other usually - used packaging materials , such as multilaminate film dish , PP trays , PET tray and PVC bulla gang .

The study , post out by RISE ( Research Institutes of Sweden ) Bioeconomy whole for Pro Carton , the European Association for Carton and Cartonboard Manufacturers , and equal critique by Intertek , provides an insight into the comparative C footprints for packaging in different consumer sectors , alongside detailed explanations of the element driving those comparative results .

Article image

RISE ’s rocker - to - heavy comparing ensures that the intact lifecycle of promotional material is use up into account – from how it is produce ( or grown in the case of the wood used in cartonboard manufacture ) to processing and disposal . The study reports both fogey unripened - business firm - gas ( GHG ) emissions and biogenic GHG expelling and removal .

Fossil GHG emissions arise from non - renewable sources such as fogy fuels , while Biogenic emission uprise from the burning of biofuels and the degradation of bio - based Cartesian product . Biogenic removals refer to CO2 intake from the atmosphere through photosynthesis during biomass growth .

Pro Carton General Manager Tony Hitchin commented : “ Whilst the unique aspects of the life - cycle of fiber - based promotion are occupy into score when calculating the full carbon footmark we also want to see what the results would be when only the fossil green - star sign - gas ( GHG ) emissions were considered and the cartonboard solutions gave a favorable result . ”

Commenting on the results , Pro Carton ’s Hitchin said : “ The figures in this table clearly show that the preponderantly cartonboard packaging consistently tally better than the alternatives when considering the impact per 1,000 units . Cartonboard clearly proffer a protective , commodious , and client - favorable alternative to established fogy - based ring .

“ We know from other research that consumers have an overwhelming preference for cartonboard packaging over credit card , 8 to 1 best-loved cartonboard / cardboard in our late survey amongst 7,000 consumers , and this account further supports the merit of change to cartonboard promotional material . ”

The research compare the cradle - to grave carbon footmark of the arrant promotional material solution rather than just compare the cloth on a per MT fundament . Hitchin add together : “ It ’s lie with that the carbon wallop per MT of material is much lower for cartonboard than polymer disregarding of whether you look just at dodo emission or also take the biogenic emissions and removal into consideration . We want to compare products on a per whole basis too as cartonboard promotion may not consider the same as a fossil - based root . moreover , the rebirth and end - of - sprightliness shock for each of the answer will be dissimilar . ”

For the full report , please get through here .

For more information : Pro Cartonwww.procarton.com